|
0 registered (),
8
Guests and
5
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Registered: 07/09/04
Posts: 15
|
|
5167 Members
107 Forums
15061 Topics
182759 Posts
0 Posts past hours
Max Online: 722 @ 04/10/08 12:10 PM
|
|
|
#80458 - 05/09/05 05:07 PM
Re: Flam Height
[Re: ZealotAssasin]
|

Registered: 03/22/04
Loc: St. Louis/Springfield, MO
|
Quote:
So basically the main note of the flam isn't much higher than the grace note right?
... in a way, yes.
In most cases, people will be playing 9"/3" (accent at 9", tap at 3") and play the flams at around 1" or 1.5" (from set, no lift). In this case, the flam stroke would be at 1.5" (normal flam height), and the note directly following would be 3" (tap height).
I've never heard anybody doing what the above poster is talking about - otherwise you'd see BD playing at 9"/6" with flam strokes at 6"... which isn't the way it happens, and I've never seen anyone else who does that.
_________________________
missouri state university - snare 05,06 phi mu alpha sinfonia, iota rho - spring 06
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#80459 - 05/09/05 10:01 PM
Re: Flam Height
[Re: hyperionmsu]
|

Registered: 01/07/05
|
Quote:
Quote:
So basically the main note of the flam isn't much higher than the grace note right?
... in a way, yes.
In most cases, people will be playing 9"/3" (accent at 9", tap at 3") and play the flams at around 1" or 1.5" (from set, no lift). In this case, the flam stroke would be at 1.5" (normal flam height), and the note directly following would be 3" (tap height).
I've never heard anybody doing what the above poster is talking about - otherwise you'd see BD playing at 9"/6" with flam strokes at 6"... which isn't the way it happens, and I've never seen anyone else who does that.
Agreed. The height of the grace not always stays the same, unless you do things like flat flams and double stops. What he described is pretty much the way I play. I have never seen anyone play the way that the person 2 posts above described.
THE little MAN
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|